Activate Learning Cycle aligned
Connect & Check • Share • Present • Apply • Recall & Review
Brain • Motivation • Emotions
Reach for the Star

Are relationships becoming more individualised?

AQA A Level Sociology 7192 · Families & Households · Lesson 14

CONNECT & CHECK | SHARE | PRESENT | APPLY | RECALL & REVIEW
Resources that teach. Learning that lasts.

Your learning journey

Connect & Check → Share → Present → Apply → Recall & Review

Explain the key concepts, apply them accurately to the supplied case and answer the enquiry with a qualified, evidence-led judgement. Use fictional examples. You do not need to disclose personal experiences.

Written prompts attempted: 0%.

Answers save locally in this browser on this device. Export a backup before switching devices or browsers. No account or teacher dashboard is connected.

Recall and connect

Retrieve the previous lesson, then record a view you can revisit.

Missed the preparation? Read the recap

Why do feminist approaches not form one explanation? They place different emphasis on discrimination, capitalism, patriarchy and intersecting structures. What is agency? Capacity to interpret and act within social constraints. Why might a formal opportunity be difficult to use? Money, time, dependence, discrimination or inaccessible services may restrict practical options.

Check an explanation after your attempt

They place different emphasis on discrimination, capitalism, patriarchy and intersecting structures.

Check an explanation after your attempt

Capacity to interpret and act within social constraints.

Giddens: negotiated intimacy

Giddens’s pure relationship is sustained through what the relationship provides to the people involved, rather than only through external tradition. Pure does not mean morally superior or conflict-free. Confluent love is contingent: continuation depends on an ongoing relationship rather than an unconditional promise of permanence. Negotiation may create opportunities for equality, but the model does not establish that every relationship already operates this way.

Open the vocabulary reference
Individualisation
A process in which people must increasingly construct and manage their own biographies.
Detraditionalisation
Weakening of the taken-for-granted authority of inherited traditions.
Reflexivity
Monitoring and reconsidering action in the light of information and experience.
Late modernity
An account of intensified modern processes rather than a complete break from modernity.
Pure relationship
Giddens’s model of a bond sustained for the satisfaction the relationship itself provides.
Confluent love
Giddens’s idea of active, contingent love dependent on a continuing relationship.
Negotiation
Discussion and adjustment of expectations and arrangements.
Contingency
Dependence on conditions rather than guaranteed permanence.
Risk
Uncertainty about possible adverse outcomes.
Biography
The pattern and story of a person’s life over time.
Constraint
A condition limiting realistically available action.
Interdependence
Mutual reliance among people.
Postmodernism
Approaches emphasising fragmentation, plurality and limits of one overarching account.
Plurality
Coexistence of multiple forms, meanings or ways of living.
Commitment
A continuing obligation or attachment to a person or relationship.
Unequal choice
Different practical capacity to exercise nominally available options.
Check an explanation after your attempt

It is sustained through the rewards of the relationship itself. Pure does not mean perfect, morally better, necessarily unmarried or free from inequality.

Check an explanation after your attempt

It depends on a continuing relationship that satisfies those involved, rather than an assumption that the bond must last regardless of its quality.

Individualisation and risk

Beck and Beck-Gernsheim examine tensions as people increasingly construct biographies while depending on close relationships. Choices about work, place and commitment must be coordinated, and responsibility for managing uncertainty can become individualised. Individualisation is not the same as selfishness or living alone. People may have to make choices while remaining materially and emotionally dependent on others.

Open the vocabulary reference
Individualisation
A process in which people must increasingly construct and manage their own biographies.
Detraditionalisation
Weakening of the taken-for-granted authority of inherited traditions.
Reflexivity
Monitoring and reconsidering action in the light of information and experience.
Late modernity
An account of intensified modern processes rather than a complete break from modernity.
Pure relationship
Giddens’s model of a bond sustained for the satisfaction the relationship itself provides.
Confluent love
Giddens’s idea of active, contingent love dependent on a continuing relationship.
Negotiation
Discussion and adjustment of expectations and arrangements.
Contingency
Dependence on conditions rather than guaranteed permanence.
Risk
Uncertainty about possible adverse outcomes.
Biography
The pattern and story of a person’s life over time.
Constraint
A condition limiting realistically available action.
Interdependence
Mutual reliance among people.
Postmodernism
Approaches emphasising fragmentation, plurality and limits of one overarching account.
Plurality
Coexistence of multiple forms, meanings or ways of living.
Commitment
A continuing obligation or attachment to a person or relationship.
Unequal choice
Different practical capacity to exercise nominally available options.
Check an explanation after your attempt

People increasingly have to plan and account for their own life paths. This concerns social organisation and responsibility, not a claim that everyone lacks concern for others.

Check an explanation after your attempt

Partners may need to negotiate work, place and expectations without a single accepted script. More possible routes can create uncertainty about agreement and continuity.

How much choice, and for whom?

Late-modern accounts emphasise transformations within modernity. Postmodern interpretations give greater weight to plurality and less uniform pathways; Stacey’s US research explores changing family arrangements. Neither label proves unlimited freedom. Housing costs, care responsibilities and unequal resources can constrain negotiation or exit. Comparing ideals, actual practices and structural conditions makes evaluation more precise.

Open the vocabulary reference
Individualisation
A process in which people must increasingly construct and manage their own biographies.
Detraditionalisation
Weakening of the taken-for-granted authority of inherited traditions.
Reflexivity
Monitoring and reconsidering action in the light of information and experience.
Late modernity
An account of intensified modern processes rather than a complete break from modernity.
Pure relationship
Giddens’s model of a bond sustained for the satisfaction the relationship itself provides.
Confluent love
Giddens’s idea of active, contingent love dependent on a continuing relationship.
Negotiation
Discussion and adjustment of expectations and arrangements.
Contingency
Dependence on conditions rather than guaranteed permanence.
Risk
Uncertainty about possible adverse outcomes.
Biography
The pattern and story of a person’s life over time.
Constraint
A condition limiting realistically available action.
Interdependence
Mutual reliance among people.
Postmodernism
Approaches emphasising fragmentation, plurality and limits of one overarching account.
Plurality
Coexistence of multiple forms, meanings or ways of living.
Commitment
A continuing obligation or attachment to a person or relationship.
Unequal choice
Different practical capacity to exercise nominally available options.
Check an explanation after your attempt

Late modernity stresses intensified change within modern social processes; postmodern approaches stress plurality or fragmentation and question a single standard pathway. These broad positions contain internal variation.

Check an explanation after your attempt

If alternative housing is unaffordable, a person may have less practical ability to change a living arrangement. Formal permission to choose does not supply the resources needed.

Apply the evidence

Fictional case: Erin and Dev regularly discuss how to divide care and whether their partnership meets their needs. Dev is offered work in another city. Erin’s local caring commitments make moving difficult, and two homes would be unaffordable. They negotiate a temporary arrangement and plan a review. The account illustrates negotiation and constraint; it does not establish a national trend.

Adults examining materials together; their relationships and reasons are not established.
Identify what is visible and what needs further evidence.
Check an explanation after your attempt

Adults are examining materials together. The image does not establish family ties, beliefs, gender identity or the reasons for their actions. Use participant accounts or relevant contextual evidence before applying the theory.

Optional scaffold

Name the concept → select a precise case detail → explain the connection → state what the detail cannot establish. Rehearse aloud, then write independently.

Check an explanation after your attempt

Discussion of the relationship’s value fits negotiated intimacy; coordinating the job move with personal plans illustrates managing biographies. Neither establishes a completely pure relationship.

Optional scaffold

Name the concept → select a precise case detail → explain the connection → state what the detail cannot establish. Rehearse aloud, then write independently.

Check an explanation after your attempt

Caring commitments tie Erin to place; housing costs limit living separately. Show how these conditions narrow the options the couple can realistically negotiate.

Challenge and judge

Make a precise claim, connect it to evidence and state its limits.

Check an explanation after your attempt

Compare accounts or practices over time using consistent measures, consider different groups, and distinguish changes in reported ideals from actual decisions. One invented couple cannot establish a trend.

Optional scaffold

Name the concept → select a precise case detail → explain the connection → state what the detail cannot establish. Rehearse aloud, then write independently.

Check an explanation after your attempt

Traditional expectations may weaken or be contested without disappearing. Resources, care and continuing norms can restrict choices; explain variation between settings and groups.

Prove: retrieval check

Answer without notes, then check explanations. Retry after correcting insecure ideas. This is separate from the 15-mark mini-test.

Q1. Which meaning best fits individualisation?
Q2. Which meaning best fits pure relationship?
Q3. Which meaning best fits contingency?
Q4. Which meaning best fits postmodernism?
Q5. Does a pure relationship mean a morally perfect relationship?
Q6. What can the supplied fictional case establish?

Not marked.

Prove and improve

Complete retrieval, then write independently for eight minutes.

Success criteria

Develop two distinct points. For each, identify the concept, explain how it works and use an accurate example or comparison relevant to the question. Extended writing needs teacher review. No automatic mark is given.

Prepare for Lesson 15

Read the three short passages and answer the preparation questions.

Smart: connected lives

Carol Smart’s personal life perspective examines how people remain connected through memories, emotions, obligations and shared histories. It questions accounts that treat each person as freely constructing a life independently. Connections can be supportive, difficult or ambivalent. Investigating what a relationship means to participants does not require assuming that all attachments are freely chosen or beneficial.

Two connected concepts

Personal life: A perspective examining meaningful relationships, attachments and lived connections. Connectedness: The ways a person’s life is bound up with other people.

A question to bring

Explain how connectedness challenges an isolated-individual account. People’s decisions are bound up with obligations, memories and other people’s lives. A choice cannot be understood solely as a preference made by a detached individual.

Check an explanation after your attempt

People’s decisions are bound up with obligations, memories and other people’s lives. A choice cannot be understood solely as a preference made by a detached individual.

Your progress summary

Completion records attempts, not correctness. Review your extended response with a teacher and use the feedback to choose your next practice.

Restore a backup

Resource: RFTS-AQA-AL-SOC-7192-FAM-L014 · v1.0. Original Reach for the Star learning resource. The six-mark task is a classroom bridge assessment, not an official AQA Paper 2 format. Teacher mark guidance is supplied separately.